Courtroom backs CRA in rejecting couple’s $54,000 transferring expense declare

Article content material

Summer time is a well-liked time for Canadians to maneuver, particularly for households with children who hope to have their youngsters start the educational 12 months of their new college by the start of September. For eligible people, the prices of transferring could be considerably defrayed by claiming a tax deduction in your transferring bills, however provided that you meet sure situations.

Article content material

A current case handled a pair’s transferring bills and whether or not they have been tax deductible, however earlier than leaping into the small print of the case, let’s start with a fast refresher of the transferring expense guidelines.

Article content material

Below the Earnings Tax Act, you possibly can write off your transferring bills if you happen to moved for work, to run a enterprise or to be a full-time pupil. The bills could be deducted from the employment or self-employment earnings you earned at your new work location. To qualify, your new residence should be at the very least 40 kilometres nearer to your new work or college.

Assuming you qualify, you possibly can declare cheap transferring bills that you just paid for transferring your self, your loved ones, in addition to any home goods. Eligible transferring bills embody the prices of packing, hauling, movers, in-transit storage and insurance coverage in your home goods, in addition to journey bills.

Article content material

Article content material

Journey bills can embody: motorcar bills, meals and in a single day lodging to move you and your loved ones to your new residence. Momentary residing bills for as much as a most of 15 days for meals, and short-term lodging close to the outdated, in addition to the brand new residence, are additionally tax deductible.

Other than these apparent bills related to the bodily transfer, eligible bills also can embody numerous ancillary prices reminiscent of the price of cancelling the lease in your outdated residence in addition to different incidental prices associated to your transfer, reminiscent of charges paid to vary your tackle on authorized paperwork, change your driver’s licence and utility hook-ups and disconnections for both residence.

Prices related to promoting your outdated residence are additionally tax deductible, together with promoting, notary or authorized charges, actual property commissions and any mortgage penalty related to paying off your mortgage earlier than maturity. Equally, prices related to shopping for your new residence, together with authorized or notary charges, in addition to any switch taxes paid for the switch or registration of title to your new residence, are additionally tax deductible.

Article content material

Given all these potential transferring prices, it’s not stunning that the price of a transfer can add as much as massive bucks, making a tax deduction, if relevant, very engaging. Think about the current case of a Quebec couple who tried to deduct almost $54,000 of whole transferring bills between the 2 of them on their 2019 tax returns.

The couple labored on the similar Montreal regulation agency. Their former residence, outdoors of Montreal, was near one of many partner’s youngsters from a previous relationship, and each taxpayers had moved to that location in 2013 or 2014 for private causes, whereas already working on the regulation workplace. In 2019, they then moved to Montreal to cut back commuting time after the youngest of the partner’s youngsters accomplished highschool. It’s this transfer, in 2019, that prompted them to incur the substantial transferring bills, which they tried to deduct on their 2019 tax returns.

Article content material

The Canada Income Company denied every of the taxpayer’s claims for transferring bills, and the couple took the matter to Tax Courtroom. The difficulty earlier than the choose was whether or not their transfer constituted an “eligible relocation.” An eligible relocation is particularly outlined within the Tax Act as a transfer that’s made with the intention to allow a taxpayer to hold on enterprise or take up employment at a spot in Canada, known as a “new work location,” offered the 40 km distance take a look at is met.

The couple argued that they moved to Montreal for “skilled causes” and that they meet the legislative situations to assert transferring bills because the Earnings Tax Act doesn’t specify a time restrict inside which the taxpayer should transfer to be entitled to the deduction.

Article content material

Whereas it’s not disputed that the couple had a former residence outdoors of Montreal, and a brand new residence in Montreal that was 40 km nearer to the couple’s regulation agency, the priority the CRA had was that there was no “new work location” in 2019, the 12 months the transferring bills have been incurred and claimed. The couple continued to work on the similar regulation agency as they did earlier than the transfer.

The CRA argued that with the intention to be entitled to the transferring expense deduction, it’s important that there be a brand new work location and that it should be geographically completely different. The CRA famous that regardless of numerous legislative amendments to the transferring expense deduction through the years, Parliament by no means eliminated the brand new work location requirement from the act. Within the case at hand, the CRA argued that the couple merely doesn’t have a brand new work location associated to the rationale behind their transfer, and subsequently the taxpayers weren’t entitled to the transferring expense deduction.

Article content material

The choose acknowledged that prior case regulation has lengthy acknowledged that the Earnings Tax Act doesn’t present for any time restrict inside which a transfer in residences should happen after the beginning of employment on the new work location so as to have the ability to declare transferring bills. However this merely implies that a taxpayer could take a while earlier than transferring to be nearer to his new work location. It doesn’t imply {that a} taxpayer can transfer away from their administrative center after which transfer nearer to it a number of years later, as was the case with this couple.

The choose summarized that with the intention to declare the deduction, a taxpayer should show that they’ve a brand new work location. Since this couple continued to work on the similar regulation agency as earlier than their transfer to Montreal, they merely didn’t have a brand new work location and thus their transferring bills weren’t tax deductible.

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning, with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com

Article content material