Federal price range: Capital features tax, extra could goal high-income earners

Article content material

We’ve got a date. Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland will ship Canada’s federal price range plan on March 28, giving us lower than two weeks to take a position about what could — or could not — be included therein, which additionally means time is operating out to do any important planning earlier than any potential tax modifications.

Article content material

Nobody is aware of with any certainty what will likely be within the upcoming price range, however we will glean some perception on its potential themes from the 226-page pre-budget Report of the Standing Committee on Finance issued final week, which contained 230 separate suggestions for tax modifications and spending.

Article content material

Among the many proposals, the next advice could set the tone: “Undertake a public evaluate to establish federal tax expenditures, tax loopholes and different tax avoidance mechanisms that significantly profit high-income people, rich people and enormous companies and make suggestions to get rid of or restrict them.”

With that ominous theme in thoughts, listed here are some potential tax modifications that would goal higher-income Canadians, together with some potential planning ideas.

Article content material

Prime tax bracket

The highest federal tax fee of 33 per cent at the moment kicks in at an revenue of greater than $235,675 for 2023, which is a 6.3 per cent bump within the threshold over 2022 because of the excessive inflation we’ve been experiencing over the previous 12 months. The NDP’s pre-election platform hoped to extend the highest fee by two proportion factors to 35 per cent. If enacted, this might deliver the highest mixed marginal tax fee, as soon as provincial tax is factored in, to roughly 56 per cent in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia, and to 57 per cent in Newfoundland and Labrador.

The same proposal to bump up the highest fee for the very best revenue earners was lately included in United States President Joe Biden’s price range announcement earlier this month. He known as for a high federal revenue tax fee of 39.6 per cent, up from 37 per cent, for taxpayers incomes greater than US$400,000.

Article content material

Article content material

Surplus strips

The federal government could determine to close down a well-liked non-public company tax-planning association that some refined taxpayers have been using to distribute company surplus (primarily, retained earnings for tax functions) from their company at capital features charges, relatively than on the larger charges for Canadian dividends, or by way of the cost of a wage or bonus.

The Canada Income Company has beforehand tried to problem surplus strip transactions, however the courts have typically held that such a planning is suitable, and doesn’t violate the overall anti-avoidance rule, for the reason that Earnings Tax Act doesn’t include a normal coverage requiring shareholders to take away their surplus by way of a dividend relatively than a capital achieve.

Article content material

The federal government tried to close down such a planning as a part of its non-public company tax reforms in 2017, however these proposals had been in the end deserted after important public criticism.

Various minimal tax

Final 12 months’s federal price range famous that “some high-income Canadians nonetheless pay comparatively little in private revenue tax as a share of their revenue.” To handle this, the federal government introduced a proper evaluate of the choice minimal tax (AMT), the outcomes of which had been initially supposed to return out in final fall’s financial replace. As a substitute, the federal government acknowledged {that a} “detailed proposal and path for implementation” could be launched within the upcoming price range.

After all, we have already got a federal AMT at a 15-per-cent fee. The main the reason why some high-income Canadians pay low efficient charges of tax has nothing to do with nefarious tax planning. For essentially the most half, high-income earners are doing nothing greater than claiming registered retirement financial savings plan deductions, charitable donations and dividend tax credit, and incomes half-taxable capital features.

Article content material

South of the border, Biden’s latest price range included a proposal to introduce a brand new 25-per-cent minimal tax on people whose internet price is greater than US$100 million. This new tax could be completely different, in that it will be imposed on each revenue and unrealized capital features for the wealthiest 0.01 per cent.

Capital features inclusion fee

Lastly, no dialogue of potential price range modifications could be full with out a minimum of pertaining to the capital features inclusion fee. At present set at 50 per cent, you could recall that the NDP’s platform proposed a hike to 75 per cent.

In preparation for the price range discussions, Jonathan Rhys Kesselman, emeritus professor at Simon Fraser College’s College of Public Coverage, simply launched a paper entitled Pathways to Reform of Capital Positive aspects Taxation in Canada that considers the case for growing taxes on capital features in Canada, and the implications for the upcoming reform of the AMT.

Article content material

Kesselman reveals there’s a excessive focus of capital features amongst comparatively few taxpayers and at very excessive incomes, and means that focusing on an elevated capital features inclusion fee, both on giant features above a sure greenback quantity or by filers with very excessive incomes, would sharply scale back the variety of affected taxpayers, “easing each administration and compliance in addition to public acceptance.”

Biden’s price range proposed an identical measure. The U.S. at the moment taxes lengthy‐​time period capital features and dividends at a high fee of 20 per cent federally, plus internet funding revenue tax (NIIT) of three.8 per cent. The U.S. price range proposed taxing capital features at a brand new high marginal revenue tax fee of 39.6 per cent (plus elevating the NIIT to 5 per cent) for taxpayers with greater than US$1 million of annual revenue.

Article content material

If a change had been introduced to Canada’s capital features inclusion fee, it will possible be efficient as of price range day (March 28). This implies traders who concern a bump within the inclusion fee may think about accelerating any planning, together with a possible rebalancing of their portfolios by taking features now, thereby locking in a 50-per-cent inclusion fee. There are additionally extra refined tax methods that would purchase you a while should you’re uncertain what may occur to the inclusion fee on price range day.

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.

_____________________________________________________________

If you happen to appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.

_____________________________________________________________