Jamie Golombek: In case you crammed in your electronic mail deal with in your tax return, you might be on the hook for any notices from the Canada Income Company
Critiques and suggestions are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made by way of hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
In case you crammed in your electronic mail deal with on the entrance web page of your T1 private tax return, you could have formally registered to obtain most Canada Income Company communications by way of electronic mail notification. This implies the onus is on you should you overlook to examine your electronic mail and miss an vital communication, which may find yourself costing you huge time must you miss a CRA discover of reassessment.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Take, for instance, a latest tax case determined in early October which concerned one more taxpayer who overcontributed to his tax-free financial savings account (TFSA). The taxpayer was in Federal Courtroom requesting a judicial overview of the CRA’s resolution by which the company refused to waive the overcontribution taxes he had incurred due to overcontributing to his TFSA throughout the 2021 taxation 12 months.
Article content material
Below the Revenue Tax Act, the CRA might train its discretion to waive or cancel the overcontribution tax if an affordable error resulted within the extra contribution, and motion was taken immediately to take away the surplus contribution.
On July 20, 2021, the CRA issued a TFSA discover of evaluation (NOA) for the taxpayer’s 2020 tax 12 months advising him that he had overcontributed to his TFSA in October, November, and December of 2020. The tax was calculated primarily based on one per cent per thirty days of the overcontributed quantity.
The taxpayer was additionally instructed that to restrict future penalty tax, he ought to instantly withdraw from his TFSA any extra quantity that could be held there. As well as, the taxpayer was cautioned that he had “adverse contribution room” for 2021 as a result of the overcontribution he had made within the 2020 tax 12 months exceeded his 2021 TFSA contribution restrict.
Prime Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
On July 26, 2022, the CRA issued to the taxpayer a second TFSA discover of evaluation (NOA), this time for the 2021 tax 12 months. The 2021 NOA confirmed that the taxpayer by no means withdrew the overcontributions that have been first reported within the 2020 NOA, however as a substitute made “important further contributions” to this TFSA account in 2021. Because of this, the quantity due in tax and penalties was assessed to be a whopping $57,623.
In late September 2022, the taxpayer acquired a set discover from the CRA, which prompted him to log in to his CRA My Account on-line portal, which made him conscious of the quantity due. It seems the taxpayer by no means noticed the unique 2020 NOA till Sept. 29, 2022. He mentioned he had not acquired a letter or electronic mail, suggesting that maybe an electronic mail discover from the CRA might have been routed to his junk electronic mail folder. The taxpayer acknowledged he was unaware that TFSA contributions have been restricted, and it was “not possible for him to withdraw the overcontributions as he had misplaced these funds.”
The CRA rejected the taxpayer’s request to cancel the penalty tax for a number of causes.
First, the taxpayer’s TFSA contributions continued after the issuance of the 2020 NOA. Second, the taxpayer had indicated that his supply choice for CRA correspondence was by the use of electronic mail and electronic mail notices have been certainly despatched to the e-mail deal with supplied, and that the place notices are eligible for digital supply, they aren’t printed and mailed. And, lastly, whereas the CRA officer did acknowledge that the taxpayer’s funds on this specific TFSA had been misplaced and subsequently couldn’t have been withdrawn, the CRA’s data indicated that the taxpayer nonetheless had different lively TFSAs from which the overcontribution may have been withdrawn.
Commercial 4
Article content material
Because of this, the CRA officer refused the taxpayer’s request for aid.
Shortly thereafter, the taxpayer once more wrote to the CRA requesting it cancel or waive the assessed tax, reiterating that his overcontribution was “a mistake and he was unaware of contribution limits.”
The CRA once more refused the taxpayer’s second request to cancel or waive the assessed taxes. Whereas the second reviewing officer acknowledged that the surplus contributions weren’t intentional, the officer concluded they weren’t the results of an affordable error, noting that it’s the taxpayer’s duty in a self-assessment tax system to take care of data, overview statements and, when mandatory, request data.
The taxpayer turned to the federal courtroom asking a choose to find out whether or not the CRA’s resolution refusing his request to cancel the assessed tax was “affordable.” As we realized from prior instances, an affordable resolution is one that’s “internally coherent, follows a rational chain of research, and is justified in relation to the details and the legislation that constrains the decision-maker.”
Commercial 5
Article content material
In submissions earlier than the courtroom, the taxpayer reiterated that he was unaware of TFSA contribution limits and that he was a novice investor, and asserted that his TFSA now contained a zero steadiness. He acknowledged his actions resulted within the overcontribution, however submitted that his “misunderstanding and the compassionate nature of his circumstances justify aid.”
Whereas the choose was sympathetic to the taxpayer’s circumstances, he discovered that the taxpayer had not demonstrated that the CRA’s resolution was unreasonable.
The CRA officer had concluded that the taxpayer’s extra TFSA contributions, whereas not intentional, weren’t the results of an affordable error. Moreover, all obtainable TFSA funds had not but been faraway from the taxpayer’s lively TFSAs.
Because the choose wrote, “The truth that the taxpayer didn’t have precise information of the surplus contribution within the 2020 tax 12 months till September 2022 doesn’t increase a difficulty of equity. … The (taxpayer) doesn’t dispute that the CRA notified him of the 2020 and 2021 NOAs electronically, as specified by his chosen technique of supply. Having chosen digital discover, the (taxpayer) can’t argue that discover was inadequate, significantly the place he acknowledges a failure to examine his account commonly.”
Commercial 6
Article content material
Really helpful from Editorial
To keep away from this drawback, David Sherman, a tax lawyer and writer, recommends that each one taxpayers arrange an automatic reminder to examine their CRA electronic mail for all accounts (private revenue tax, GST/HST, company, plus any others) as soon as a month, in case you could have been notified of one thing you must cope with.
Failure to take action could be expensive.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
In case you preferred this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.
Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it’s worthwhile to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
Article content material